Publication & review policy
single blindscope New research in Arts, Commerce, Humanities, Science. Comprehensive reviews also welcome.
Peer review: Two independent experts; editor holds final decision. Manuscripts may be declined without review if: outside scope, lacking technical merit, fragmentary, or poorly written.
Submission & originality
Submission implies: work not previously published (except abstract/thesis); not under consideration elsewhere; approved by all authors; if accepted, not published elsewhere (including electronically) without copyright holder’s consent. Plagiarism detection may be used.
✸ Ten rules for prompt handling
- Manuscript fits Aims & Scope
- In accordance with article type guidelines
- Written in good English, Hindi or Sanskrit
- Numbered sections; line & page numbers; double spaced
- Ethical statement (if humans/animals involved)
- Conflict of interest statement at the end
- Figures + tables combined ≤ 6 (extra as supplementary)
- All relevant references provided
- Cover letter: introduce article + explain novelty
- Highlights: 3–5 points · 85 characters each
Article categories & length
📄 Research paper
≤ 5000 words (incl. up to 6 tables/illustrations) · ≤ 30 references · original full‑length.
📚 Review article
≤ 7000 words · ≤ 50 references · focus on last 5 years · topical interest.
Also: rapid communications, short communications, viewpoints, letters to the Editor, book reviews.
Formatting & structure
- Double‑spaced, wide margins, white paper, numbered pages and consecutively numbered lines.
- Font 10 or 12 pt; corresponding author identified (fax, email, full postal addresses for all).
- Keep a copy; original discarded after 1 month if not returned.
📑 Order of manuscript:
Title → Authors → Affiliations → Abstract → Keywords → Main text → Acknowledgements → References → Vitae → Figure captions → Tables (figures/tables imported in text). Corresponding author marked with asterisk.
Abstract ≤ 150 words, factual, self‑contained; avoid references/uncommon abbreviations.
Introduction: short, concise, problem/hypothesis, mention previous work (Indian context preferred if relevant).
Methods: self‑explanatory, enough detail to repeat.
Results & Discussion: interpret, not recapitulate; relate to hypothesis; scientific speculation allowed.
Conclusion: crystallize results & implications.
Figures & tables
🖼️ Electronic artwork
- Uniform lettering, embed fonts, use Arial/Times etc.
- Number figures in sequence, logical naming
- Captions separate, not attached
📊 Tables
Number consecutively, footnotes with superscript lowercase, avoid vertical rules. Data should not duplicate figures/results.
Figure captions: brief title + description, explain all symbols.
Reference style
🔢 Citation in text: superscript numbers in square brackets, e.g. [1]. Every reference must appear in the list. Unpublished results / personal communications may be mentioned in text (not in reference list, unless with ‘Unpublished results’ tag).
🌐 Web reference: full URL + last accessed date + DOI/author if known.
References are listed in numerical order (superscript numbers) at the end.